Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall transfer or take over any access medium.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on September 2017, borrowed KRW 600,000 per account when sending the head of the Tong and the card to be paid by the Party to the Party to the Party to the Party to the Party to the Party to the Agreement, and borrowed KRW 20,000,000 in total when sending three copies.

" Upon receipt of a proposal, around 16:00 on September 11, 2017, at the office of Franchising "D' C" located in Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, the head of the Sinsi District Office sent a physical card connected to the account of the Defendant to B by using the Defendant's name, and then assigned the access media by adding a password to the password.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement prepared in F;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph/cinematographic output, investigation report (netly 5), and account transaction details;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is chosen for a crime (excluding punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant’s access medium is subject to KRW 6 million and transfers its access medium. Ultimately, the Defendant’s access medium is used for the criminal act of Bosing and then reaches KRW 6 million (see, e.g., evidence record 28 pages) and the Defendant does not have considerable efforts to recover such damage; on the other hand, the transfer approach medium is one, a single person, a person having the same criminal record, there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant received the transfer consideration, and there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant received the transfer consideration.