The sentence against the accused shall be five million won or more.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2019, at approximately 23:20, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to pay the taxi expenses and to return home, the Defendant paid the taxi expenses to the Defendant who franchis and franchis, instead of paying the taxi expenses, at the front of the Busan High Police Station C District of the Busan High Police Station, the Defendant paid the taxi expenses to the Defendant, and recommended the said D to return home.

(e) Visuale;

‘A sound is fluored with the two hand floor, and the chest part of the D was tightly pushed down once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. E statements;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work site in the C District;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order shall include the pattern and degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties, the plannedness of the crime, the existence of the same and similar records (no fine of 200,000 won is imposed as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, 1995), the confession of the crime, the confession of the mistake, and other sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.