1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) amounting to KRW 3,00,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount pertaining thereto from July 9, 2014 to October 17, 2018.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic Facts

From September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015, the relevant Plaintiff A leased a house owned by the Defendant’s husband D (SJ Seo-gu E, 202) and resided together with his/her family.

Plaintiff

B is the parent of the plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A as an insurance solicitor of Samsung Bio-resources, has managed the insurance contract between the defendant and his husband.

The defendant is operating the repair store on the first floor while living in the above housing building, and it is also a transit bus technician of the G in the interest-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Plaintiff

Since February 2014, A wanting to become a director due to the noise problem of the above house, and requested a neighboring real estate brokerage office to hold office for the above house, and there was a dispute over the lease relationship between A and the defendant.

On June 2014, the Defendant’s defamation against the Plaintiff: (a) sent a phone call to the Samsung Bio-resources Center held by the Plaintiff, and (b) told the counselor to the effect that “the Plaintiff extracted allowances for eight months or longer; and (c) the education of the manager of Samsung Bio-resources is opened.”

On June 28, 2014 and July 11, 2014, the Defendant posted a notice on the Plaintiff’s Internet bulletin board of the Samsung Bio-resources website, stating that “The education of the administrator of insurance solicitation is opened,” and “the insurance administrator managing the insurance has reported to the police on the ground that he/she raised the Defendant to the call center.”

Plaintiff

A A filed a complaint against the act of each of the above paragraphs as defamation, and the phrase “(1)” was suspected of having no public performance, and the phrase “(2)” was sentenced to the suspension of indictment.

On February 18, 2014, the defendant, who was reconstructed from the repair shop of the plaintiff B at the first floor, found that the plaintiff B was outside the building on February 16, 2014, and entered the repair shop of the first floor of the building. On February 18, 2014, the defendant returned the plaintiff B to the plaintiff around 02:30.

In this case, the plaintiff A filed a complaint with the confinement of the defendant et al.