Defendant

A, B, D, and E each fine of KRW 300,00,000, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 600,00,000, Defendant F, and G, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, B, C, and D, “2014 High 59” as a partner who has an opposing position against the I.D. at a drilling site around October 17, 2013 for the investigation of the ground before J around 10:00, and

A. Defendant A entered a safety bar installed around the construction site, stating that “A shall not work until he/she receives a written consent to dissolution from the Association” and prevents Defendant A from driving in front of the drilling machine;

B. Defendant B provides K with “The price shall be discarded in accordance with the principle” and the drilling engineer’s desire to take a drilling engineer to stop the operation of the machine;

(c) Defendant C wishes to see as safety blicks and blicks and drive blicks and blicks in blicks, with samples collected to conduct ground investigation by sound;

D. Defendant D, on the basis of the safety device, took a bath for a large amount of excreta and caused the machinery to move out, and in the manner of viewing the urine before it, the said Defendants jointly obtained permission to occupy and use a road and an excavation report from the luminous market and interfered with the legitimate duties of K for about seven hours by the head of the association of the said maintenance and improvement project association.

Defendant E, C, F, and G are union members who are opposed to the I.D. on October 23, 2013; and are found at a drilling site around 16:00 on October 23, 2013;

(a) Defendant E contains sound in order to prevent the operation of a machine by entering a safety part, and breath of the head of an association that took the Handphone at the time by hand with the Handphone, and assaults the face of the members Ma by drinking;

B. Defendant C, at the site, has expressed a great voice to K and M, such as “Abrupt, Domine, impule, impule,” and instigates residents in the surrounding areas by failing to perform abrue;

C. Defendant F, at the site, is a large interest to K and M in the field, and the “business obstruction is good, acceptable, and is not a negotiation body.”

e.g. this word;