Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,684,055, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff D, Plaintiff E, Plaintiff F, and Plaintiff G respectively; and (b) KRW 2,33,333, and the above.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are children of the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) who was hospitalized in the I convalescent Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the J is a nursing worker in charge of the deceased.
B. On November 20, 2015, while the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and received medical treatment, he/she suffered injury, such as fluenite transfusion, etc., on July 1, 2016, the Deceased received a axis from J, and fluencing a walker, which is a pedestrian aids, in order to go to the toilet at around 7:50 on July 1, 2016.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
At the time of the instant accident, it was impossible to move independently due to the overall decline caused by the elderly, and the right paralysis caused by the abortion around 201, and it was possible to access toilets with the help of another person.
On July 1, 2016, the Deceased transferred to the emergency room of K Hospital on July 1, 2016, and received all kinds of examinations, and performed drug treatment. On July 14, 2016, the Deceased discharged on July 14, 2016, and was hospitalized in the L Hospital until August 19, 2016.
E. From August 20, 2016 to December 20, 2016, the Deceased was hospitalized in Mvalescent and received medical treatment. On December 20, 2016, the Deceased died on December 22, 2016, while receiving a diagnosis of pulmonary treatment by visiting the relevant Lvalescent Hospital with an unknown heat.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 7 (including each number, if any), the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the N Association of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiffs' assertion and the J must pay attention to prevent the deceased from being dead, and the defendant, as the employer of J, neglected his duty of care to the patient, as follows, resulting in the deceased's death after being hospitalized in the hospital. Thus, the defendant is around the deceased.