All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendants to the punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. Defendant A, who recognized the instant crime and submitted several rebuttals, was faithfully engaged in the instant crime by being given official commendation several times during his school life between 24 years, and was sentenced to a fine twice for the instant crime, such as drinking driving, etc., and there is no special penalty force in addition to being sentenced to a fine twice, etc., are favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant, as a member of the National Technical Qualification Examination Committee for the interest of public educational officials, has leaked the examination problem despite the responsibility to manage and supervise the fair implementation of the examination in this case, regardless of whether the pass rate has an impact on the examination, and thus, damages the fairness of the examination and trust in the national technical qualification certificates, and damages the trust in the national technical qualification certificates by itself; the leakage of the examination problem by the Defendant eventually causes a big social strike, such as using large-scale illegal acts using computer programs, such as C, etc.; the Defendant concealed the distribution issue during the practical examination, sent it to the supervising member of the examination committee, sent it to the Defendant B by facsimile, again brings about the problem at the examination site, and then brought about the problem at the examination site. The first day of the examination, despite having been instructed to thoroughly supervise the examination, there is a great possibility of criticism against the Defendant, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

The defendant was removed from office due to the crime of this case and was subject to significant disadvantage, such as deprivation of retirement allowances, etc., and the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means, consequence, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments and records of this case.