logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.29 2019가합513537
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of electronic, electrical, and parts manufacturing business. 2) Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B’s headquarters”) is a U.S. company established under the U.S. Act for the purpose of importing and selling semiconductors and semiconductor-related equipment, and B group holding companies.

Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a Korean branch office at Defendant C’s head office.

(iii) E (hereinafter referred to as “E”);

F (F) is the German corporation established under German law, and the F (F) is the F (hereinafter referred to as the "F") taken over to Defendant B's head office on December 7, 2015.

4) Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a company established for the purpose of developing and manufacturing radio, wire, and electrical products, and is a branch office of G (G, hereinafter “G head office”) that is a large-scale company established under the Taiwan Act (hereinafter “G head office”).

B. On February 15, 2013, E entered into a total sales contract with H to take charge of selling goods supplied by H in Korea between H on February 15, 2013, and H again constitutes “I” (hereinafter referred to as “I”) on February 16, 2015.

As of April 1, 2015, F entered into a contract with I to transfer semiconductor sales business as of April 1, 2015. Accordingly, F entered into an electronic transaction arrangement with I holding the position of the Korean General Sales Agency on July 17, 2017. 2) After entering into an electronic transaction agreement with G head office, F entered into an electronic transaction agreement with G on October 2, 2017, and on November 30, 2017, respectively. Accordingly, Defendant D performed F’s total sales agency business from October 2017.

C. (1) The Plaintiff is equipped with the MAP consensus to be exported to India and calculated the quantity of dust to be generated by measuring the amount of dust to be generated by measuring the amount of dust, and then developing K products from E (in accordance with the packaging form for the same product) around July 30, 2015, for the purpose of developing the ERC consensus to be supplied to J by domestic home appliances manufacturing companies.

arrow