All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment and one hundred thousand won of additional collection) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the punishment sentenced by the court below is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. We examine both parties’ assertion of unfair sentencing.

In the past, there was a history of punishment (two times of imprisonment, one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment, and one time of fine) for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and in particular, on January 11, 201, the Daegu District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Daegu District Court on May 4, 201, and again committed the instant crime even though the period of repeated crime was completed on May 4, 2011 and the crime related to narcotics was committed again. The crime related to narcotics is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows: (a) the confession and rebuttal of the defendant; (b) the arrest of two drug offenders at the investigative agency by the defendant's information; and (c) the defendant's cooperation in investigation; and (d) the situation where the defendant

In full view of the above circumstances, Defendant’s character, conduct and environment, and other various circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, the lower court’s sentence imposed on Defendant cannot be deemed as heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant and prosecutor’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.