The judgment of the first instance is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding and self-defense) prevents the victim D, who is the spouse of the victim, from spreading the molds into the face of the defendant first, and then, the victim's chest was satisfyed by satisfying head, satisfy, and satisfy in the process of defending the defendant by satisfying head, satisfy, and satisfy, so the defendant's act constitutes self-defense without intention or self-defense.

2. The court of first instance, by asserting the same purport as the reasons for appeal of this case in the court of first instance, states in detail that the defendant's reasoning for appeal of this case is identical to the reasons for appeal of this case, the court of first instance rejected the above argument by recognizing the credibility of the victim's statement that corresponds to the facts charged of this case, after comparing the judgment of the court of first instance with the records and closely examining the above judgment, it is just and acceptable. Even if we look at the court's legal statement of the witness D additionally investigated at the court of first instance, the contents of the statement of this case concerning the reasons for the crime of this case are maintained consistent with the investigation agency and the court of first instance, and it does not affect the above judgment. On the other hand, it is difficult to accept the defendant's defense for the following reasons. On the other hand, even if the victim first accepted the part that the victim was at the time of the defendant's consent, the defendant's act of protecting the victim's chest is not sufficient to view that the defendant's bodily injury was caused by social norms.

① Although there was a conflict between the Defendant, who is the spouse, at the time of victim D, in the room without any particular case or instrument.