logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2014.02.20 2014고단11
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Goyang Branch of the District Court for the District Court on February 14, 2009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 14, 2009, but the Defendant escaped and was arrested on October 24, 2013.

1. At around 14:45 on February 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) opened and intrudeed a plastic house entrance by the victim of the victim D, who was in his/her own possession on the top of the place, using the cresh in which management was neglected, at the plastic house located in the victim D’s house located in the city of nuclear power, the victim opened and intruded the plastic house entrance by using the cresh in which the management was neglected; and (b) cut it with one gabbs equivalent to 150,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession on the top of the said place.

2. At around 16:20 on February 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender and requested to present an identification card in order to verify the Defendant’s identity; (b) by deeming that he/she was a driver’s license, he/she presented a driver’s license under the name of the “friendly type H”, which was in the possession of the remaining peace group, and presented it as the Defendant’s driver’s license.

3. On February 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 21:10 on February 21, 201, at the Young-gu Police Station Calend Team office located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, to be examined as a suspect status; and (b) was investigated as if the remaining Defendant was the Defendant’s H; (c) for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged H’s signature by stating the name in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority; and (d) issued the suspect interrogation protocol with a forged private signature to the investigating police officer I, who is unaware of such fact, as seen above, as if it was duly constituted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. The report of investigation is submitted by the suspect; and

arrow