Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On January 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Commercial Act at the Seoul Central District Court on January 5, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 13, 2012, and is currently in the grace

On May 25, 2005, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million with fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 25, 2005, a summary order of KRW 1 million with fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on October 18, 2007, and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million with fine for the same crime at the Seoul East East District Court on December 18, 2009, respectively.

On January 8, 2013, around 20:45, the Defendant driven B Eccoo vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.11% under the influence of alcohol without a vehicle driver’s license on the front of the Enterprise Bank located in Haban-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry into the results of the drinking driving control, the report on the situation of drinking drivers, the notification of the results of the drinking driving control, the driver's license inquiry report, each investigation report, the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office Agreement No. 63934, No. 63934, and judgment;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1), subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is several cases where there are unfavorable circumstances to the defendant, such as the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case even though the previous and present probation period was in existence. However, the defendant did not have any criminal records and sentence heavier than that of the same kind of probation, and the defendant has a depth of his fault, and the social relation is clear and the detention of the defendant entails excessive difficulty to his family members, and the motive and motive of each of the crimes in this case.