The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not constitute assaulting a victim as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., (i) the victim took a bath view from the defendant as stated in the facts charged in this case, and consistently made a statement at an investigative agency; (ii) the victim made a statement consistent with the victim's statement, "At the scene of the victim's telephone requesting assistance at the time of this case, the defendant took a bath for the victim (60 pages of the evidence record); (iii) the defendant did not assault the victim at the time of the investigative agency, but rather made a statement that the victim suffered a bodily injury to the face of the victim; (iii) the defendant continued to reverse his statement about the situation at the time (Articles 35, 59, and 75 of the evidence record) to the extent that it is impossible to recognize the credibility of the victim's statement as stated in the facts charged in this case; and (iv) the defendant can be sufficiently acknowledged in light of the following facts.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.