The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Even before the instant case, the Defendant committed the crime of defraudation of money against women through deception, and even after having been sentenced to a sentence for that reason, the Defendant had committed the crime of fraud against women by deceiving occupation, career, etc. during the period of repeated crime and completed the execution of the sentence. Accordingly, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment and completed the execution thereof.

Nevertheless, the Defendant again committed the instant crime similar to the past during the period of repeated crime.

In the nature of the crime of this case, some victims seems to have suffered a very heavy mental suffering as well as mere monetary damage.

Considering these circumstances, it is necessary to strictly punish the accused.

In the past, the defendant was liable for damages suffered by the victim F, and agreed to it smoothly.

However, the victim F does not actually have any doubt with the Defendant, and by telephone, obtained by deceiving the amount equivalent to KRW 19.80,000 from the Defendant’s falsehood, and was compensated for such damage. In light of the overall criminal facts of this case committed by the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim F cannot be recognized as a significant change in sentencing conditions to the extent that it changes the sentencing of the lower court. In full view of the factors revealed in the arguments in this case, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, it does not seem that the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 369 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.