logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.01.16 2019가단91813
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 40,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 12% per annum from September 18, 2019 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 9, 2003, the Plaintiff has two children under the chain of law as a married couple who completed a marriage report with C on May 9, 2003.

B. The Defendant knowingly maintained inappropriate relations, such as having sexual intercourse from around 2015 to May 2018, with knowledge of the fact that workplace rent C, who is a male father.

Accordingly, on May 9, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for damages (hereinafter “previous case”) with this Court No. 2018da79076, and this Court rendered a judgment on September 20, 2018 that “the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 1.5 million and its delay damages.”

다. 피고는 2018. 11. 13.경 C에게 “21일(C의 생일)에 여의도로 출장가는데 휴가낼 수 있어요 ”, “21일에 당신 생일이니까 당신 하고싶은거 했으면 좋겠어, 저녁밥은 살게”, “어디 펜션이나 호텔 예약하는 것도 ㅋㅋ”라는 메시지를 보내기도 하였고, 피고와 C은 그 전후로 지속적으로 메시지로 연락하고 서로 만나 성관계를 갖기도 하였다. 라.

On November 21, 2018, the Plaintiff and C met with C in order to resist the Defendant, and the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff that “A part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part of that part.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 21 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) A third party shall not interfere with a marital life equivalent to the essence of the marriage by intervening in a marital life of another person and causing the failure of the marital life. A third party shall, in principle, constitute tort against the spouse by infringing on the marital life falling under the essence of the marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on the spouse's rights thereto, thereby impairing the spouse's right.

Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448 delivered on May 13, 2005

arrow