logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고정1199
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “D” operated by C (Nam, 42) to “D” on December 22, 2017, is a person who was given a shock treatment on the right-hand side of the Defendant, and was expected to receive a psychotropic treatment, but did not comply with the treatment schedule, etc.

1. Obstruction of business;

A. The Defendant, at around 10:30 on February 3, 2018, was waiting for 6-7 persons, such as patients and their protectors, etc. for medical treatment at the time of receiving “D” on the 7th floor of Suwon-gu Busan, Busan, and on December 22, 2017, after receiving medical treatment at the above dental plant, and at the Defendant’s consent, removed dys without the consent of dys without any consent of dys.

In other dental services, the treatment was wrong because the treatment was provided by other dental services.

Hadar.

As a result, the above dental services were interfered with by force by avoiding the disturbance of 20 minutes by raising a large sound, thereby preventing the receipt of patients waiting for the above dental treatment and the calculation of patients who completed the above dental treatment.

B. On February 5, 2018, around 12:30, the Defendant: (a) obstructed C’s dental services by force by force on the grounds that C was unable to compensate the Defendant for the wrong treatment at the above place; and (b) C went to the medical room for the medical treatment; and (c) C was able to collect C’s dental services on the ground that C went to the medical room.

2. Violation C of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. is limited to the removal of the right cream for the treatment of impulses with the consent of the defendant, and there was no excessive medical treatment.

Nevertheless, the defendant 1. Definitions

(a)as described in paragraphs (b) and (b), sought compensation from C, and sought compensation from C, who did not comply with C, with access to the Internet B, which is operated by C, to slander the above dental services;

Accordingly, from February 5, 2018 to around 19:13 on the same day, the Defendant G of Suwon-gu, Busan.

arrow