1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 24,200,00 and KRW 7,700,00 among them, Defendant A shall be from July 5, 2010 to KRW 16,50,000.

1. The following facts are based on the facts. The plaintiff and the defendant A are deemed to have led to confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act. Among the plaintiff and the defendant corporation, the plaintiff and the defendant corporation (hereinafter "the defendant corporation") in consideration of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in subparagraphs 1 through 5, and there is no counter-proof.

B, C, and D filed a lawsuit against the Defendant Company on May 12, 2010 against Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Kahap2889, Daejeon District Court rendered a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration.

B. On July 1, 2010, Defendant A entered into a delegation agreement with the Plaintiff, who is a law firm, on behalf of the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff in the instant case, that the Plaintiff handles the lawsuit of the Defendant Company on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant A paid the Plaintiff a fee of KRW 7,700,000 with the retainer fee, by July 5, 2010, and agreed to pay the contingent fee of KRW 16,50,000 with the contingent fee when winning the contract (hereinafter “instant delegation agreement”).

C. Accordingly, the Defendant Company: (a) affixed the seal of the Defendant Company to the delegation letter stating that the Plaintiff shall be granted the power of attorney in the instant case; and (b) accordingly, the Plaintiff brought a lawsuit on behalf of the Defendant Company on March 8, 201; and (c) received a favorable judgment on March 8, 201.

2. According to the above facts finding as to the claim against the defendant A, according to the delegation contract of this case, the defendant A is obligated to pay the plaintiff the sum of the retainers and contingent fees (7,700,000,000 won) and damages for delay.

As such, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A seeking the implementation of the claim is justified.

3. Determination as to the claim against the defendant company

A. The plaintiff asserts as follows as the ground for the claim against the defendant company in this case.

(1) As long as the Defendant Company delegates the above case to the Plaintiff, the Defendant Company shall pay the amount of remuneration to the Plaintiff.