1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The Plaintiff sought revocation of a dismissal disposition and revocation of a disciplinary surcharge in the first instance court. The court of the first instance dismissed the claim for revocation of a dismissal disposition and accepted the claim for revocation of a disciplinary surcharge.

As the plaintiff appealed, the object of this court's adjudication is limited to the claim for revocation of the dismissal disposition.

2. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a public official who was appointed on October 29, 1996 and works for class B at the general affairs department of the general affairs department of the viewing and document statistics team from November 26, 2008 to January 6, 201, and was in charge of the establishment of records DB, etc.

B. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant requested the Daranam Provincial Personnel Committee to take a heavy disciplinary action and disciplinary surcharge for the following reasons.

1. Acquisition of third party bribe: On May 2010, the Plaintiff was issued by two fixed-term workers and delivered KRW 30 million to the Secretary-General, to the Secretary-General, on request of DB staff members in the record repository room in the early 2010, “10 million won” is available to the Director-General in the name of DB for the solicitation of inorganic contract transition from DB, and at the same time, Korea Post is needed. 50 million won will not be well seen to the upper end of the day.” The Plaintiff delivered KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff on May 20, 2010, the Plaintiff delivered KRW 200,000 to the Secretary-General on the day of delivery from DB to the Secretary-General on May 20, 2010, and the Plaintiff delivered KRW 500,000,000 to the Plaintiff on May 20, 200, 300,000 to the Secretary-General of D.