logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고정553
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2014, at around 22:46, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at a 0.222% of alcohol alcohol level, was driving B-type truck from the 1km section from the parking lot at a high school located in the Jeju Nowon-do to the front road of the bus stops at the former new female high school located in the same Do-dong from the parking lot at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the results of the control of drinking driving and the state of driving under drinking;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents his mistake, that the defendant has no power to commit any other crime in addition to the punishment of fines on one occasion before the crime of this case before the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case is significantly higher than 0.22%, and that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case is higher than 0.22%, in full view of the sentencing precedents in similar cases, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, the amount of fines specified in the summary order is not recognized as excessive, and there is no change

arrow