logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.10.17 2013고정1869
조세범처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on July 19, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 25, 2010, the Defendant reported the value-added tax for the first time in 2010 from the House of Government Taxation located at the time of the Government, and submitted a false list of total tax invoice prepared by the Defendant as if the Defendant supplied goods or services equivalent to the total value of 188,200,000 won to the company, even though the Defendant did not supply goods or services to the Sungdocom Co., Ltd.

2. Around April 25, 2010, the Defendant filed a return of value-added tax for the first period of 2010 from the above Government Tax Secretary, and submitted a false list of total tax invoices prepared by the Defendant as if he was supplied goods or services equivalent to KRW 131,782,00 from C, even though the Defendant was merely supplied goods or services equivalent to the total value of KRW 249,310,50,000 from the above company.

3. Around July 25, 2010, the Defendant reported the value-added tax for the first period of 2010 from the above Government Tax Office, and submitted a false list of total tax invoices prepared by the Defendant as if he was supplied with goods or services equivalent to KRW 30,000,000 from the above company, even though there was no supply of goods or services from C.

4. Around October 25, 2010, the Defendant reported the value-added tax for the second period of 2010 from the above Government Tax Office, and submitted a false list of total tax invoices prepared by C as if he/she was supplied goods or services equivalent to KRW 61,00,000 from the above company, notwithstanding the absence of the supply of goods or services from C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation and a written statement of completion of investigation related to trade order;

1. A list of total tax invoices by customer and a list of total tax invoices by customer;

1. Previous convictions: Case information;

arrow