logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.14 2018고정241
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall operate a motor vehicle which has ordered the suspension of operation of the relevant motor vehicle at the consent or request of the Mayor/Do Governor or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;

Nevertheless, around 10:18 on August 4, 2017, the Defendant operated a C-Scar car in the section of about 1 km at the request of the owner B from the front of the “Hammmm Kim Kim-bak,” which was located in 97 Doo-ro 20, Jung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, to the front of the “Ham-gu, Ham-gu,” which was located in 227, in the same white-ro 27.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of C earth and a car.

Although the owner of an automobile is not a person who operates an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the defendant operated the automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation reports (related to telephone communications by persons in charge of the headquarters of Jincheon-gun), perusal of the register of motor vehicle registration, inquiry into non- mandatory insurance information, and application of statutes on comprehensive details of motor vehicles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 82 subparagraph 2-2 and 24-2 (2) of the Automobile Management Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act (each of the fines) concerning the selective punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.

arrow