A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On December 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 05:55 on December 20, 2014, at the D District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office of the C District Office, and (b) when the said B District E (38 years of age) was able to go home and went out of the office and went back to the office, and (c) she again went into the said E after entering the office, the Defendant stated that “I would come to go off. I would have to go out of the office,” and (d) in drinking, the Defendant interfered with a police official’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of a crime by assaulting the said B at once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is to set the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; (b) the degree of the exercise of violence; (c) the accused’s age, character and conduct, environment and the circumstances after the crime; and (d) the community service order is added