logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.01.19 2017고단1246
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 01:00 on September 22, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 that the Defendant assaults an employee, etc. who requires the calculation of the drinking value after drinking alcohol, and received a request for presentation of an identification card from E, etc., who is a police officer of the Mana Police Station D (a police box) dispatched to the main place of “C” located in the Mana Police Station D, a police officer, etc. who belongs to the Mana Police Station, to the above police officer:

Chewing . “Chewing ...” without presenting his identification card, and later arrested a flagrant offender and flapsed in the process of getting off from the patrol car before and after the police box located in F of the same time in front of the patrol car and getting out of the patrol car. In the process, he flab, flabds and flabds and flabds, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of H and I

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize and reflects the instant crime, and there is no record that the Defendant was punished for the crime interfering with the performance of official duties; the Defendant’s assaulting is relatively minor; the Defendant’s scambling and scambling police officers on several occasions; and the Defendant sought a letter of apology and scambling with the police officers who found the damaged police officers on several occasions; the police officers who received the Defendant’s death from the Defendant and scambling the Defendant.

arrow