(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.09.04 2014고단357

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.09.04 2014고단357

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be liable for damages equivalent to the money obtained by deceit, and shall be liable for compensation P. 920.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 23, 2012, the Defendant sentenced the Ulsan District Court to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ulsan District Court on May 5, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

"2014 Highest 357"

1. The Defendant conspired to receive money from the victims who seek inquiries about the fact that he/she sold home appliances by pretending them to a business entity that sells home appliances in the domestic famous Internet shopping mall, such as M and 11 Ga, Gay, NH shopping, etc., and then, he/she conspireds to receive money from the victims who seek inquiries about it.

The Defendant acquired personal information, such as the resident number of the needy box via the Internet, and thereby made several shopping malls to be used for committing the crime, and acquired the business registration certificate of a seller of household appliances, such as D and E, via the Internet, prepared to commit the crime by purchasing the so-called bankbook passbook, which is the name passbook to be used for committing the crime through the specialized distributor, and posted a notice to the victim AJ, who asked about the sale of AI’s mutual television at 11-day, the shopping mall site located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, on September 12, 2013, and then received the money from the victim AJ from 1,517,000 won in advance, under the name of the sales proceeds immediately from the victim to 1,500,000 won in the name of 3.5 billion won in total, 1,517,000 won in the name of 1,514,200 won in the name of the AK account (the money fraud).

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, conspired to acquire the so-called “the so-called “the so-called passbook”, a borrowed-name account, for the purpose of using it for committing fraud, such as

The Defendant, together with M, via the Internet on September 2013.

참조조문

-전자금융거래법

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.01.15 2014고단1203

-광주지방법원 2020.10.15 2018고단4227

-대구지방법원 2019.09.03 2019고단1918

-대구지방법원 2019.06.13 2018고단4517

-서울북부지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단2097