The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) is that the defendant brought golf loans, etc. of the victim without the consent of the victim and the considerable time has passed, and the victim returned the above things to the victim at the point of 20 days after the victim knew that he reported this case to the police, etc., it can be sufficiently recognized that there was an intention of unlawful acquisition by the defendant.

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor ex officio, the prosecutor maintains the facts charged of larceny which the court below found not guilty on the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor, and applies for changes in indictment to add the applicable provisions to "Article 366 of the Criminal Act" and the facts charged as stated below. Since this court added them to those subject to the judgment by granting permission, the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained in this respect.

However, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles as to the primary facts charged is still subject to the judgment of the court.

나. 검사의 사실오인 및 법리오해 주장에 대하여 (1) 이 사건 주위적 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 다른 사람의 재물을 절취하고자 마음먹고 2010. 11. 23. 08:00경 성남시 분당구 C 아파트 710동 602호에 피해자 D(여, 45세)이 잠시 집을 비워 아무도 없는 틈을 타 몰래 침입하여 옷 방에 있던 시가 6,500,000원 상당의 '블랙앤화이트' 골프채 가방(가방내 시가 5,000,000원 상당의 골프채) 1개, 시가 600,000원 상당의 '꾸레쥬' 가방(가방내 500,000원 상당의 스키용품) 1개, 시가 100,000원 상당의 홍삼절편 1개를 가지고 나오는 방법으로 절취하였다.

(2) The intention of unlawful acquisition necessary for the establishment of larceny is the right holder.