Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 1. 18. 20:06 경 서울 성북구에 있는 피고인의 집에서 피해자 C를 비방할 목적으로 자신의 휴대폰을 이용하여 카카오 톡 앱에 접속한 뒤, 소외 D과 채팅을 하면서 ㅇ ㅇ 걸레니 깐 너 준거 안전 빵으로 쟤 도 괜찮으니깐 너 먹으라

고 ㅅ ㅂㄴ ㅇ라고 전송하였고, 계속해서 2016. 2. 22경 카카오 톡 앱에 접속한 뒤, 12명 정도와 그룹 채팅을 하면서 피해자를 비방할 목적으로 ㅁ ㅊ새끼들 아 당연히 지가 따먹힌 걸 먹혔다 하냐

Dog, Dog, and 76 Dog to the extent that they are suffering from drinking for a new year.

The Defendant posted a false fact through the information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement to the effect that posting a statement of facts stated in the judgment was transmitted (as at the sixth trial date);

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., as well as the selection of fines for criminal facts (the defendant asserts to the effect that there was no purpose of slandering the defendant).

In full view of the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, the content of the notice, the background and frequency of the Defendant’s writing on the instant notice, etc., which can be seen by the evidence as seen earlier, the Defendant appears to be aimed at giving a distorted fact to the victim by posting it.

Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;