The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (two years of suspended sentence for four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. It is true that the defendant has an opportunity to reflect on the fact that the defendant has been detained for a weak month, the defendant has agreed with the victim G, and the defendant has no record of being sentenced to suspension of qualifications or more severe punishment, etc. However, it is difficult for the defendant to put the defendant under the influence of alcohol, such as cutting the beer balance from the head of the head office operated by the victim G and destroying the wall and the large amount by drinking, and the two police officers dispatched upon receipt of the report were assaulting the above police officers to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender, thereby hindering the performance of their official duties, and thus hindering the execution of official duties, and taking into account the various circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the case is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.