A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a small-scale car B.

1. On March 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.170% from the section of about 15km to the road at a point where approximately 368 km away from the ambnd from the ambridge in the trade name in Osan-si to the ambnd in the ambi-si.

2. On March 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car and stopped on the side of the expressway in order to use a mobile phone while driving the road four-lane at a point of 368km away from the border on the side of the road located on the side of the city in Ansan-si; (b) on March 16, 2015, the Defendant stopped on the side of the expressway in order to use the mobile phone while driving on the side of the expressway in Busan-do.

After using a mobile phone, the Defendant re-enters the expressway into the fourth lane. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely change the vehicle line by operating direction direction, etc., giving prior notice of change of course, and taking into account the traffic conditions of the front and rear left, and giving prior notice of change of course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not properly look at the rear while under the influence of alcohol, and due to the negligence of entering the four-lanes of the Defendant’s vehicle, which led the four-lanes of the Defendant’s vehicle in the same direction as the Defendant’s vehicle, and the front right part of the DDama Dob, which was driven by the victim C (Nam, 55 years old) driving in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s vehicle,

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the affected party, such as catitis that requires treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party, even though the damaged vehicle was damaged by KRW 882,561.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police in relation to C.