Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and a fine of twenty million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As K affiliated with the Korea Rail Network Authority (hereinafter “Authority”), the Corporation was in charge of the management of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the South-Nam high-speed rail, which is ordered by the Corporation, and the Defendant B, as the managing director of the project of the project of the construction of the railroad engineering company (hereinafter “M”), served as the responsible supervisor in charge of the supervision of the project of the project of the construction of the building of the South-Nam high-speed rail, which

한편, N㈜(이하 ‘N’), O㈜, P㈜(이하 ‘P’), Q㈜는 공동수급사로 컨소시엄을 구성한 다음, 이 사건 공사의 입찰에 참여하여 2012. 7. 4. 이 사건 공사를 낙찰 받고,

7. On April 2013, after entering into a contract for construction works with the Korea Rail Network Authority, the instant construction has been underway since April 2013.

Although the instant construction was conducted from October 2012 to be completed around May 2014, the construction was scheduled to be completed. However, since April 2013, the construction began from the delay of construction due to the delay in the preceding construction of the instant construction, which is the six months prior to the scheduled completion period. As the construction is requested by the Corporation to perform construction works in accordance with the initial scheduled completion period, the total construction period has been reduced for the delayed period.

In the process of performing the wintering construction in accordance with the reduction of the construction period above, the expenses incurred in installing vinyl and heat lines on the track in order to prevent concrete dynamics at the time of loading concrete with low temperature, solar power, and in order to maintain track strength at a certain level.

As additional construction cost has been invested, and the change of concrete removal method has been required due to reasons such as change of design, P and N provided money and goods to the Defendants through the head of each field office to ensure that the procedure for approving design change is smoothly implemented, and the Defendants provided convenience related to construction work, such as approving design change.

1. Defendant A: (a) on January 2, 2014.