logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.05.07 2019나61234
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a dentist who operates a dental clinic in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant dental clinic”).

From February 12, 2018 to April 13, 2018, the Defendant is a patient who has undergone partial correction of an infant at the instant dental surgery.

B. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant posted a notice stating “G” as the title “F” on the Kapet bulletin board under the name of “E” (hereinafter “B”) and “I” (hereinafter “the first bulletin board”) stating that the gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym gym g.

C. On July 31, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency for mediation of a medical dispute against the Defendant due to the side effects of correction. On October 16, 2018, the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency appraised as follows as to whether the Plaintiff was negligent in medical treatment.

around July 2018, the Defendant deleted the name of the instant dental license from the first and second bulletin materials.

E. At the entrance of the instant dental plant, the Plaintiff’s medical records indicated as “H academic regular members,” but the Plaintiff.

arrow