logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.07.12 2017가합70680
소유권확인
Text

1. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet between Defendant B, C, D, E, and Defendant Incorporated Foundation A is Defendant B, C, D, and E.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. G and Defendant Incorporated Foundation A (hereinafter “A”) as an incorporated foundation of the network F’s gift to Defendant B, C, D, and E

on July 2, 2009, July 2, 2009, the deceased F, the founder of which is each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estates”).

(B) Defendant E (A, who is the wife of Nonparty C, D, and D, whose shares were 2/9, and whose shares were 2/9, are the wife of Nonparty C, D, and D, whose shares were 2/9.

(2) The netF died on January 23, 2010, and Defendant B, C, D, and E (hereinafter “B, etc.”) completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on legacy on January 23, 2010 with respect to each of the instant real property on February 22, 2010 (attached Table 1 through 15) and February 24, 2010 (attached Tables 16 and 17).

3) Nonparty I, H, and J (hereinafter “I, etc.”) (hereinafter “I, etc.”) who is the legal heir of the deceased F, who did not receive each of the instant real property from the deceased F.

Around October 4, 2010, the Seoul Western District Court 2010Gahap6765 filed a lawsuit against Defendant B, etc., and on October 4, 2010, Defendant B, etc. transferred 32 parcels of land within the Incorporated Foundation G, among the net F’s inherited property, to I, etc. on the ground that the ownership was returned to I, etc., and the ownership of each of the instant real property, except the land transferred to I, etc. on the ground that the secured portion was returned among inherited property, was reverted to the Defendant B, etc.

B. In order to exclude Defendant A, Defendant B, etc. from the value of the inherited property, Defendant B, etc., and Defendant B, etc., with the aim of excluding each of the instant real property from the value of the inherited property, even though Defendant A knew that the acquisition by prescription against Defendant B, etc. was completed, Defendant B, etc. was bequeathed each of the instant real property to Defendant B, etc., and Defendant B, etc. knew of such fact, the deceased actively participated in the tort.

arrow