1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420

(1) The Defendant asserted that the period of extinctive prescription for commercial activities between the Plaintiff and the Defendant had expired as it constitutes a commercial activity. However, as seen earlier, the Defendant, like the first instance court, did not make any further determination as to the above assertion, insofar as the Defendant was not the borrower of the above lending activity. 2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.