The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant's appellate brief (unfair sentencing) recognizes the defendant's fault and reflects the defendant's fault, the sentence of the court below that sentenced the fine of KRW 3,000,000 is too unreasonable.

2. The so-called 's passbook passbook' that the defendant provided 2,00,000 won from his name was actually used for phishing crimes, and the so-called 's passbook passbook', which is produced through the crime of transferring the electronic financial transaction access media, is widely used for various crimes such as phishing, etc. so that it is possible to conceal criminal proceeds and make it difficult to find an offender and is an essential means for realizing the crime, and thus, social prejudice is serious. The circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are serious; the defendant has the power to be subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; the court below seems to have already reflected in the sentencing; there is no special change in circumstances that can be considered in the judgment of the court below; the defendant's age, sex, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.; thus, the court below's punishment is too unfair, and the above assertion is not justified.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.