beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a resident who resides in the head of Suwon-si Office B and Dtel in Suwon-si (hereinafter referred to as “the instant officetel”) E, and the victim F is a representative of the instant officetel management unit.
1. On January 30, 2017, the Defendant, by means of the instant officetel E from January 30, 2017, prepared a notice stating “to the owner and occupant” using the instant officetel E, referred to the victim as “the victim” and dismissed managers and managing members who had been unreasonably and unlawfully managed for nine years from 2009 to 2017, and constituting a new management unit in accordance with the following provisions of the Act on Condominium.
After all, I are engaged in embezzlement and breach of trust with which occupants' gymn's gymn's gymn's gymn's gym
For a period of four years until now, ten members of the complaint are changed and the accounting is changed from time to time, etc., and the remainder of the complaint is found to have been placed voluntarily on dismissal or corruption in order to conceal the corruption or destroy evidence intentionally.
“After describing the content “,” printed out to the owner of the instant officetel and approximately 400 occupants, sent them by mail.
However, the Defendant alleged that “the victim would receive 21 service personnel from the instant officetel controlled entity, and paid 39,90,000 won for service fees, but only 16 service personnel would actually be provided to the controlled entity, thereby causing losses to the instant officetel occupants by making excessive payments to the controlled entity,” and filed a complaint for the crime of occupational breach of trust, etc. on July 26, 2013. However, since the Defendant’s appeal and reappeal against the non-prosecution disposition was dismissed, the Defendant’s appeal and reappeal against the non-prosecution disposition was also dismissed, the Defendant committed embezzlement or the crime of breach of trust while working as the representative for the management of the instant officetel.