logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.05.31 2018고단45
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment was finalized on April 21, 2017. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 18, 2017.

On March 5, 2014, the Defendant, at the credit collection office operated by the Defendant in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant, “The head of the Daegu-gu branch office in the Republic of Korea, the person who can investigate all the information as well as the personal and personal information of the obligor, is at the head office, is responsible for the collection of the claim and the case is resolved.

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant had committed fraud against the clients, and had not been in the position of the president of the Daegu Branch by receiving notification of termination of the contract from the E Co., Ltd., and had not been in the position of the president of the EM branch. There was no intent or ability to properly perform the claims collection business requested by the victims of the case with bad credit standing to receive money from the victims of the case, and to use it for the payment of agreed money from the victims of the case, repayment of debts, living expenses, etc.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50,000 won from the national bank account under the name of the Defendant for the same day from the victim, under the pretext of the commencement of debt collection, from the victim, from the time to June 15, 2015, received the total amount of KRW 5,254,000,000 from that time, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Contracts with delegation of credit collection and credit investigation, content certificates, records of compromise on loans, expenses incurred in collecting claims and credit investigation, text of the Daegu District Court Decision 2014Na56888, Daegu District Court Decision 5688;

1. Details of transactions and those of entry and withdrawal transactions;

1. A previous conviction: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, a report of investigation (former and subsequent rulings) and a report of investigation (Attachment to latter concurrent judgments).

arrow