logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.07.24 2014구합52817
보험급여징수처분 취소
Text

1. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant’s entry in the “Collection Schedule of Insurance Benefits” as to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs the business of manufacturing, installing, and selling tea plant, and is not a constructor under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.

B. On September 17, 2013, the Plaintiff and the limited liability company heading E.S. company (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) concluded a contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Plaintiff to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5,065,00 (excluding value-added tax) of value-added tax (hereinafter “instant contract”) in consideration of the following: (a) the Plaintiff and the non-party company’s transfer of the instant factory (hereinafter “instant factory”) to the non-party company located in U.S. 208-1 (hereinafter “the instant factory”); and (b) the non-party company entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5,065,00 (excluding value-added tax) in consideration of the agreement.

Serial Quantity 1 JAW 4634 Mobile Installation ( Existing Goods) 1 Form 2 FED 1 Form 3VB SUPPPOT 1850 ( Existing Goods) Form 4 MC300 CON 1 Form 4 MC300 mobile installation ( Existing Goods) Category 5 CONSH1300 mobile installation ( Existing Goods) 10 type 10 type 7 de facto installation (existing Goods) 10 type 7 de facto installation (existing Goods) 10 type 8 existing equipment

C. On September 15, 2013, around September 17, 2013, the Plaintiff’s factory head and business director B designated the location to set up the instant clerit, and four employees of the State non-party company were 4 employees of the State non-party company for two to three hours. D.

B and the workers belonging to the Plaintiff were built on September 25, 2013 to move and install the instant cracks, etc. within the factory of this case.

E. Workers C belonging to the Plaintiff, and D, while engaged in dismantling containers on October 3, 2013, due to a fire-fighting phenomenon during the process of dismantling containers, and C was behind the container level, and D suffered each injury after the container level.

(f) The Plaintiff.

arrow