1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff entered into a contract for goods supply, such as the exhaustr of electrical construction, among the main apartment construction works located in Goyang-si, Yangyang-si, Inc. on June 14, 2013, and supplied goods. The plaintiff and the defendants entered into an agreement for goods supply, around December 15, 2013, "The Hanyang-si, Co., Ltd., Ltd., supplied the plaintiff with 31,087,678 won (including value-added tax as of December 15, 2013) and 25% of the balance of the claim amount of the raw materials supplied by the plaintiff, and the remaining materials added after November 25, 2013, and until December 31, 2013, the defendants confirmed that the contract for goods supply was completed within 205% of the total amount and 5% of the total amount of 20% of the total amount paid to the plaintiff.

As to this, the Defendants asserted that since the agreement with the Plaintiff on December 15, 2013, the Plaintiff did not supply the goods to the Plaintiff, the amount equivalent to KRW 7,074,750 should be deducted from the said amount on the grounds that the Plaintiff was supplied with the goods equivalent to KRW 7,074,750 from the Plaintiff, instead of the Plaintiff. However, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 alone did not receive from the Plaintiff the amount of

It is insufficient to view that the Plaintiff has a duty to compensate for the amount equivalent to the above amount, and otherwise recognize it.