1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a person who works as the managing director of the business department of the non-party limited liability company C (hereinafter referred to as "non-party company"), and the defendant is a vice president of the non-party company.

On September 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on September 7, 2019, entered into the D Standing Director of the Non-Party Company D with the following customer response; (b) stated that “I will no longer observe any such act; and (c) sent the e-mail received from Non-Party E’s employee F.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant e-mail.” On September 28, 2017, the Defendant sent the e-mail (e-mail, referring to the translation and the evidence attached to the evidence No. 3, referring to the document No. 1) as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant e-mail”. The addressee: Nonparty Company’s channel team, G director, Plaintiff, and H: Defendant, I: J (Interim omitted) K (Interimization) L and A’s suspicion of public invitation: It is doubtful that, similar to the previously reported M and E cases, A is attempting to put L into the N contract of KSO-KNPC (National Police Agency).

O requested D's D's D'(Dealist) registration, but A provided L with L with information that D's seaworthiness registration for the same project.

After an accurate date, A finally visited theO and pretended that he does not have any knowledge about the project.

This seems to be a conflict of interest and a public offering to bring about potential C's loss, damage to C's brand, and confusion of end customers if it is not clearly corrected immediately.

The plaintiff in this case C.

Although the Defendant filed a complaint against the e-mail of this case by openly pointing out false facts, the Seoul Central District Court prosecutor sent the Plaintiff, etc. on March 30, 2018.

An e-mail extends to two pages.