logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.01.08 2019고단586
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On January 24, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the port support of the Daegu District Court, and on December 7, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime.

【Criminal Facts】 On October 16, 2019, at around 22:40, the Defendant driven a Fluter vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.144% in a section of about 200 meters from the front of the road located in D to the front of the road located in D.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the Road Traffic Act's prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the situation of drinking drivers;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Inquiry reports and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the results of investigation (a summary order attached to the same type of power);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not sufficient in that the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had committed the crime.

However, the defendant reflects his criminal conduct in depth, and the crime of drunk driving in 2015 was the lowest level of standard values for drunk driving at the time of blood alcohol concentration of 0.050%, and there was no record of crime exceeding the fine by the defendant, and all of the sentencing conditions in the records, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, were determined as per the disposition.

arrow