The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of one year and two months, confiscation and collection KRW 1.2 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and recognized the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus requires a simple and strict punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, the defendant committed the crime of sharing and carrying out the role of the receiver in order to operate the "teltel commercial sex acts" under the name of the defendant, and the crime was committed in an secret and organized manner, such as claiming P as the owner of the business during the investigation and trial, the fact that the characteristic of the crime was extremely poor, especially the fact that the defendant was moved to and continued to operate the place during the investigation and trial process, and the other circumstances that constituted the conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means, method, result, the circumstances before and after the crime, and criminal record.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.