beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 12, 2014, around 16:04, the Defendant: (a) around 16:04, on the ground that the victim D(39 years of age) was fluorily fluored to the Defendant’s daily activities in the C cafeteria; (b) taken the head and the back part of the victim’s head and the back part of the victim’s head on several occasions with the main and back part of the drinking and hand-on road, which is a cellular phone at the same time, and continued to take twice the head of the victim’s head on two occasions.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement (a statement that no time has been written several times and that time has been taken one to two times by launch);
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. The photograph of CCTV image confirmation (the defendant's continuous selection of the victim) (the defendant asserted that he had only 1 to 2 times the victim's birth, but considering the above evidence, the defendant's acceptance of the defendant's assertion can be recognized as supporting the fact that he sent the victim several times. Accordingly, the defendant's assertion shall not be accepted).
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (4 to 1 year and 6 months) of the first type of bodily injury (the scope of recommending punishment] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant has no particular power, except for the same kind of fine] once, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine, the victim suffered significant bodily injury due to his head's top, and the defendant suffered serious injury to the extent of being subject to corrosion, but the defendant did not properly recover from the damage, and the defendant did not properly recover from the damage, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in the oral proceedings of this case as ordered.