1. The Defendant each of the KRW 6,000,000 against Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively, and KRW 3,000,000 against Plaintiff E, F, and G. respectively.

1. The Plaintiffs, upon the occurrence of the obligation to pay penalty, operate an I Daily Branch of Korea in Sungnam-si, from a member of the branch of Sungnam-si, and the Plaintiff A operates the I Daily Branch of Korea. The Plaintiff B, the model of the Plaintiff B, the Fymar Branch of Korea, the Fymar Branch of Korea, the Plaintiff C, the Domestic Branch of Korea, the Plaintiff C, the Youngnam-si, the Pymar Branch of Korea, the Plaintiff C, the Pymar Branch of Korea, the Plaintiff E, the Pymar Branch of Korea, and the Plaintiff G operates the Imar Branch of Korea.

The defendant is publishing Jin Examination as the Week.

On February 2, 2013, the plaintiffs entered into a business partnership agreement between the defendant and each branch office (hereinafter referred to as the "contract of this case") to which the plaintiffs deliver to each of the relevant branch offices by inserting the J examination of the defendant's issuance together with the J examination of the defendant and deliver it to each household.

The term of the contract is five years from February 2, 2013 to January 2018, and the plaintiffs are entitled to receive the delivery fee of 1.30 won in J-Examination from the defendant.

Article 12(1) of the contract of this case provides that the plaintiff or defendant may cancel or terminate the contract of this case by giving written notice to the other party when the other party violates the contract without justifiable grounds, or it is difficult to maintain the contract due to compulsory execution against the principal or the other party, the commencement of bankruptcy procedures, etc. against the principal or the other party, or when there is any other serious reason that it is difficult to perform this contract. Paragraph (3) of this case provides that where the plaintiff or the defendant intends to cancel the contract of this case for reasons other

On February 2, 2014, the defendant suspended the delivery of J-Examination through each branch of the plaintiffs, and delivered the J-Examination through the K Twitter of the divided district.

[Based on recognition, the defendant's act of suspending delivery of J-Examination through each of the branch countries of the plaintiffs constitutes an act of violating the contract of this case, and the defendant intends to implement the contract of this case more in light of the fact that the defendant delivers it through another newspaper country.