logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.02.13 2018고단4768
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】

1. On November 1, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 5,000,000 won by violating the Illegal Check Control Act at the Jeonju District Court on March 22, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 22, 2013. On April 27, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Seoul Southern District Court and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2018.

2. On January 6, 2015, Defendant AU was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months at the Seoul High Court for a violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Leave (Misappropriation), and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 20, 2015. On July 24, 2015, Defendant AU was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants, from August 2012 to the end of the Guri-si, operated a business of distributing building materials in the name of AW Co., Ltd.

On September 1, 2012, the Defendants issued a note of KRW 26,450,00 in face value and KRW 40,000 in face value and KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 1 note of KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 40,000 in face value to the victim AX at the above company’s material warehouse. The Defendants issued a note of KRW 40,00,00 in face value and KRW 1 note of KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 40,00 in face value and KRW 1 note of KRW 1 (BA and the due date on November 2, 2012).

However, in fact, the Defendants intended to operate a business by acquiring a legal entity that can issue bills, purchasing goods by issuing the current account and financing funds, selling them, and settling bills, etc. In addition, the Defendants’ financial status was not good due to the low sales volume and the sales volume of the bills, and the payment date of multiple bills and shares issued in other locations is also due to the number of bills and shares issued by the victims in 2012.

arrow