A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:10 on June 6, 2014, the Defendant returned home of the second floor of the Defendant, a house located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the second floor of the Defendant, and returned home, but the entrance was locked and not opened, putting the door door door door up, broken off the glass door, and when the husband was at home, he was at home, and the slopeF belonging to the Ulsan-dong Police Station E Zone E Zone of the Ulsan-dong Police Station called to the Defendant after receiving a report, asked questions to identify the circumstances of the case, and “I reported whether I reported or not. I will do so. I will do so,” while continuing to take care of the above D, I pushed the chest of the F in order to stop the above D, pushed the chest with two hands, face one time with hand, followed, and, after arresting a flagrant offender, assaulted the back seat of the F in the front seat, and, as the f in the back seat, I walk the chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of crimes and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. On-site and victim photographs and work logs for E-district units;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (the decision of sentence] (6-1-4 months) (the decision of sentence] and the partial denial of a crime, etc., so choice of imprisonment is deemed to have no serious anti-competence, and the sentencing data on the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, home environment, personality and behavior, are considered as having no other serious anti-competence, and the punishment is determined as per the order.