The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the court below is justified in finding the Defendant guilty of each of the facts charged in this case as to the violation of the Act on the AR Company’s AR Company’s Act (Embezzlement), occupational embezzlement, false accusation, violation of the Commercial Act, and the minutes of the board of directors related to the acquisition of shares of the AR Company.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles as to the recognition of facts contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the status of the custodian or the intent of unlawful acquisition, intention or purpose of false accusation, and the establishment of the crime of forging private documents or the crime of inducing payment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.