All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a corporation established on February 25, 2008 and engaged in multi-family housing management business, etc. using approximately 500 full-time workers, which is a council of occupants' representatives of the petition-gu Seoul apartment (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case") and the council of occupants' representatives.

(2) On November 12, 2018, after entering into an entrusted management contract with the Defendant Company, the Plaintiff is a person who entered the Defendant Company and served as the head of the instant apartment management office on November 12, 2018.

B. The Plaintiff was paid KRW 4,400,00, job allowances of KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, and KRW 4,100,000, which are the vice president of the Defendant, with Nonparty E on January 7, 2019.

3) From January 9, 2019, the Plaintiff did not work in the instant apartment from January 9, 201. (c) The Plaintiff applied for relief from unfair dismissal and the result thereof 1) On April 4, 2019, the Chungcheongnamnam Regional Labor Relations Commission filed an application for relief from unfair dismissal with the Defendant and the Respondent’s representative council with the Defendant and the Respondent.

(F) The above committee rejected the plaintiff's petition against the council of occupants' representatives on the ground that the plaintiff's eligibility is not recognized, and the defendant's petition against the defendant was rejected on the ground that the defendant was not dismissed, and the plaintiff was voluntarily withdrawn. [The plaintiff's ground of appeal is without merit, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 3, and Eul's evidence No. 1 and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. On January 7, 2019, the vice president of the Plaintiff Defendant demanded the Plaintiff and the transferee to find the Plaintiff by joining E that is scheduled to be appointed as the new senior management officer. This constitutes an explicit declaration of intention of dismissal.

As above, the defendant does not have any justifiable reason under the Labor Standards Act.