1.(a)

The Defendants shall set forth in attached Table 1 A from the Plaintiff.

The "compensation amount" as stated in the list of claims shall be the money.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement in the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 as to the right to claim partition of co-owned property, the Defendants, the heir of M, who died on April 25, 2016, are indicated in the separate sheet No. 2 attached hereto, as to L. 123.9/182 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

The facts that each share in the share in the land of this case in the co-ownership column of the port of this case is owned (the shares of the defendants are as stated in the inheritance shares in the Schedule A of Attached Table 1) and facts that the plaintiffs and the defendants did not reach an agreement on the division of the land of this case. Thus, the plaintiffs, co-owners of the land of this case, who are co-owners of the land of this case, may file a claim against the defendants, who are other co-owners, for the

2. Method of partition of co-owned property;

A. In the case of dividing the co-owned property by the method of full-price compensation, in principle, each co-owner shall have the area of the land acquired by each co-owner equal to the ratio of his co-ownership. However, if the shape or location of the co-owned property to be divided, the situation of the use thereof, or the economic value is not equal, it is allowed to divide the economic value corresponding to the share ratio in consideration of all the above circumstances. If certain requirements are met, it is allowed to divide the co-owner by requiring the adjustment of the economic value in cash between the co-owners. Furthermore, it is recognized that it is reasonable to acquire the co-owned property to a specific person by comprehensively taking into account the causes of co-ownership, the proportion of co-ownership, the economic value of co-ownership, and the wishes of co-owners to divide, etc.