Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:35 on July 1, 2013, the Defendant rejected a separate collection promotion slip distributed by the victim D(S) who was the victim of the village located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, without being subject to the separate collection promotion slip distributed by the victim D(S. 45). Accordingly, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “I am back to the victim who is not the bit of bitch bitch fri, but the bitch bit of bitch bitch fri, I am back to the bit of bitch fri, I am. I am. I am. I am the victim’s right shoulder and left shoulder and part of the victim’s right shoulder due to their flobs, and caused the victim’s injury on the left-hand shoulder, which requires a stable treatment for five days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each fact-finding inquiry reply letter [the defendant and his defense counsel at the time that he was involved in the part of the victim's shoulder at the time, but the defendant did not get off the part of the victim's shoulder and part of the victim's shoulder or part of the victim's shoulder with the two hands, on board the part of the defendant, but according to the consistent and detailed statement of the witness D and each description of the fact-finding inquiry letter, etc., according to the consistent and detailed statement of the witness D and each description of the fact-finding reply letter, it is recognized that the defendant has taken off the part of the victim's right shoulder, left shoulder and part of the victim's shoulder with his hand as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below]. The application of the law

1. In full view of the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act’s choice of punishment (the victim D was diagnosed with the same content as the facts stated in the criminal facts as the E Hospital on the following day of the instant case, and the investigation agency and this court consistently stated that the victim’s physical damage constitutes “injury” under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and that the victim’s physical damage constitutes “injury” under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act.