logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.15 2017고정263
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2016, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim B (the remaining and the 33 years of age) and his female-friendly job offers C (the 31 years of age), who was found in the Defendant’s business establishment and brought a disturbance to the Defendant. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant found the victim B’s “E Party Head” in AsanD around 00:10 of the same month, and used the victim’s “E Party Head” at around 00:10 of the same month, she took a bath to the victims, was boomed on the floor, she spathds the victim B’s face on several occasions, and used the victim B’s face on several occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect (B or C);

1. A copy of a report on the occurrence of a case;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 260 (Selection of Penalty)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the method and degree of assault and assault, relationship between the defendant and the victims, and the defendant in separate cases (the Daejeon District Office Branch Office 2016, 35149 of the Daejeon District Office) in which the defendant expressed his/her intent not to want punishment by mutual agreement with the victims of the instant case, and the agreement is immediately written in separate cases (the Daejeon District Office Do Public Prosecutor's Office 2016, 35149 of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office), so it is difficult to view that the agreement has the effect on the instant case, and it is impossible to suspend sentence due to the suspension of qualification for the defendant or more.

arrow