logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.10.02 2014가단42013
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts that, on October 11, 2014, the Defendant committed an assault against the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff, and caused an injury requiring approximately 8 weeks of treatment, such as the Plaintiff’s gire’s gire’s gire-fire’s gire-fire’s damage, heat and knee’s gre-gre-gire-gel. As compensation for damages, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 1,920,030,00,000, in total of KRW 8,570,000,000, and KRW 33,570,030,000, and delay damages. However, according to the evidence evidence No. 1, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant abused the Plaintiff, but the Defendant did not have any other evidence as to the Defendant’s injury on the part of the Plaintiff’s gire-fire-fire-gire’s gire-ge-gel’s injury.

2. The part of damage caused by neglect of a vessel was alleged to the purport that the Defendant, at the port on October 13, 2014, unclaimed the Plaintiff’s vessel on the sea by cutting the ropes of the Plaintiff’s vessel (C) which was anchored at the port on October 13, 2014, and caused damage equivalent to KRW 10,510,00 due to theft of high-priced equipment, such as Schlage, respiratory and cromatic venture business, which was installed on the vessel, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the above monetary amount and compensation for delay. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant, as compensation for damage, only with the descriptions or images of the evidence No. 11 and 12 (including the serial number) of the Plaintiff’s vessel at the port on October 13, 2014, left the Plaintiff’s vessel on the sea and left the Plaintiff’s vessel on the sea. There is no other evidence to recognize otherwise.

arrow