logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.19 2017고단4327
특수상해
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

However, the defendant A is above two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A around 00:30 on September 29, 2017, around the street in front of the “F” operated by the Defendant in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the parking problem led to the victim G (39 years of age) and the vision, booming the victim’s body by pushing the victim’s body with his hand, cutting down the victim’s hair, cutting down the victim’s hair, cutting down the victim’s hair, cutting down the victim’s face over the floor, walking the victim’s face, walking the victim’s face by drinking, walking the victim’s face, cutting down the metal waste box (1m in total length), which is a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the victim, etc. that requires treatment for about 40 days between 40 days.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the above date, at the above time and place, was assaulted by A, flaging a shoulder drum, which is a dangerous object, to the victim G, who was seated on the upper floor after being assaulted by A, and “hicked,”

The victim threatened the victim by referring to "absoning death."

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A suspected suspect, victim, and on-site photograph;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV image recording devices installed in the place of occurrence, etc.);

1. CCTV;

1. The investigation report (the attachment of the victim G injury diagnosis report) [the defendant B asserts that he does not have any fluence, and that he does not have any stimulation, but this court has lawfully adopted and investigated the witness G investigation agency and legal statement, CCTV image and investigation report (the counter investigation of the stimulse) of the witness G, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant B took the stimulation of the stimulation and made intimidation to the victim. Thus, the above argument is not accepted] and the law shall be applied.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Defendant B of Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special injury)

arrow